nope. only the one with 448 cores is almost as GTX 570 since you cant change cores in GTX 560 ti with 384 cores is not even close to GTX 570 or yes it is close but its not GTX 565 its just GTX 560 ti when the 448 core one is more like GTX 565. and yes FPS difference in games between GTX 570 and GTX 560 ti is +10 in almost every game when 560 Ti 448 loses only with 3-5fps even tho i dont know if its rly worth it to buy GTX 570 when GTX 560 ti loses only buy a few frames.
Overclocked I said, not standard. Its fact that a 560TI even the 384 core can be overclocked to 570 standard clocks. But most 570 are overclocked anyway.
Funny how that doesn't mention the standard one overclocked. Also that cards the only overclocked one, if all the others were overclocked then it wouldn't be close.
Look at that vs a standard 560TI at stock clocks. 3fps difference in BF3. For £37 more.
@Tommyn the regular 560 Ti got min 850 core clocks and 2000 shader clocks when 448 core one got avarage of 700 core clocks and 1900 shader clocks and even the regular 560 Ti 448 is more powerful than a 560 Ti with higher clocks so if you overclock 560 Ti 448 over the 560 Ti it will be more powerful than GTX 560 Ti since you cant change ammount of cores=more cores more powerful it is so it doesnt matter how much you overclock that 560 Ti the 448 will beat it always by a mile. also GTX 560 Ti is only 1gb when 448 got 1280MB of VRAM when for example BF3 runs better with 1280mb than with 1gb, with maxed out BF u may encounter screen freezes and FPS drops even when ur fps would be +40 since you dont have enough VRAM to play it with highest settings.
prob need to buy a new videocard to.
this is my system
Moederbord : Asus P7P55D LE
Chipset : Intel P55
Processor : Intel Core i5 750 @ 2666MHz
Fysiek Geheugen : 4096MB (2 x 2048 DDR3-SDRAM )
Videokaart : ATI Radeon HD 4890 Series
Harde Schijf : Western Digital WD2500AAKS-00VSA0 ATA Device (250GB)
wanne spend so less as possible on a card. www.alternate.nl
prob gonna buy there any advice is really really welcome.
as i dont know shit about whats good or not.
with that card i got 250fps stable not in the smoke so i want the same card or better wanne spend no way more then 200 like i said as less as possible:D
If I was you I wouldn't get nvidia card, because there are ATI 7000 series out VERY soon. If not already. Any of them would be more powerful than any graphics card out.
If I was you I wouldn't get nvidia card, because there are ATI 7000 series out VERY soon. If not already . Any of them would be more powerful than any graphics card out.
www.scan.co.uk/products/2gb-msi-gtx-560ti-oc-twin-frozr-ii-40nm-4008mhz-gddr5-gpu-880mhz-shader-1760
mhz-384-cores-plus-bf3-g
www.scan.co.uk/products/1gb-msi-gtx-560ti-oc-twin-frozr-ii-40nm-4200mhz-gddr5-gpu-880mhz-shader-1760
mhz-384-cores
but is there any difference between the 2?
www.scan.co.uk/products/2gb-msi-gtx-560ti-oc-twin-frozr-ii-40nm-4
008mhz-gddr5-gpu-880mhz-shader-1760mhz-384-cores-plus-bf3-g
1st has more memory so faster in higher res :)
edited 2012-02-06 00:20:12
My old 8800, 4gb ram and amd athlon x3 got me 250 np. Using 460 now and solid 250
www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gaming-graphics-card-review,3107.htm
l
A 560Ti is basically a GTX 565. Halfway between 560 and 570.
so if you are willing to pay 20£ more get EVGA one with 448 cores www.scan.co.uk/products/1280mb-evga-gtx-560-ti-classified-40nm-39
00mhz-gddr5-gpu-797mhz-shader-1594mhz-448-cores-2x-dl-dvi-m
that card with some OC will even beat GTX 570 so dunno if you wanna use 20£ more to get +20fps in BF3 for example 1fps per 1£ xd
edited 2012-02-06 21:10:54
And £37 more for that card. not worth it.
edited 2012-02-07 20:12:25
gets closer to 570 sometimes. sick card it is
Great card.
Got it, amazing card for the price couldnt want anything better. Would recommend it:D
mhz-384-cores-plus-bf3-g
bought this 1 so see how it goes :D
edited 2012-02-07 16:22:20
edited 2012-02-07 20:21:17
edited 2012-02-08 08:58:58
00mhz-gddr5-gpu-797mhz-shader-1594mhz-448-cores-2x-dl-dvi-m
1280MB=better if you only use one monitor + 448 cores are on almost same level as GTX 570 best performance with 220£ card with 10 year warranty)))
tion-oc-40nm-3900mhz-gddr5-gpu-750mhz-shader-1500mhz-448cor
shouldnt i just get that 1 if i get a 448 core version ?
k,3082-9.html
almost tops HD 6970 with some OC so ye its best card for about 200£.
Look at that vs a standard 560TI at stock clocks. 3fps difference in BF3. For £37 more.
edited 2012-02-08 08:59:57
edited 2012-02-07 17:35:45
this
this is my system
Moederbord : Asus P7P55D LE
Chipset : Intel P55
Processor : Intel Core i5 750 @ 2666MHz
Fysiek Geheugen : 4096MB (2 x 2048 DDR3-SDRAM )
Videokaart : ATI Radeon HD 4890 Series
Harde Schijf : Western Digital WD2500AAKS-00VSA0 ATA Device (250GB)
wanne spend so less as possible on a card.
www.alternate.nl
prob gonna buy there any advice is really really welcome.
as i dont know shit about whats good or not.
with that card i got 250fps stable not in the smoke so i want the same card or better wanne spend no way more then 200 like i said as less as possible:D
Price - 90 / 120 max.
-edition-oc-7V8D.html?utm_source=google&utm_medium=product+search&utm_content=Q200
cancelled my order and got this 1 instead :)