Let's NOT move to MW3
I compared this game with MW2. I really liked pubbing in MW2 and even black ops in the beginning. This 'review' is for people thinking about to buy the game. Sorry if because of me you are forever alone because nobody wants to buy it. And for the record; in almost every game I'm on top so I'm not whining because I suck in the game.
Maps:
- Way too crowded with 100 objects and details
- Bad spawns
- Too many little ally's and buildings you can go into
- To many objects you bump up to or looking like you can jump over them while you simply can't
Conclusion: Made by someone who thinks that cod is about running, killing and running
Graphics :
- Better then black ops, worse then MW2 and even worse then cod2 (dx9 high sett)
- Things like multiGPU (more then one videocard) are hidden showing simply that the developers are lazy
- They did less specular maps on objects so that why its better then black ops although alot of textures are shit because they want you to use Dept of Field so you can't see close details and give you a headache instead
- Alot of 'stolen' objects from MW1 and MW2
Conclusion: This was a lego game, just copying and pasting all the things from the previous cods
Gameplay:
- Moment from hipfire -> (to) aiming down the sight is SLOW. It's at least 1,5 second and you even need a perk to unlock it.
- Aiming down the sight has almost the same sensitivity as normal what makes aiming less precise.
- You can throw nades just as far as you can throw a flash. WHYYY???
- WHY do all the maps have so many ally's and walls and rooms and cars and boxes and buildingparts etc etc. You can't reload somewhere safely because you can't see people comming.
- UAV = the same as Xradar. It's fun in pub but easy.. so why make it easier with advanced UAV???
- The maps are smaller then BF maps though getting lost in MW3 is easier then in a maze. In BF you don't get lost that easy so mapsize shouldn't be an excuse
- I had a game where everyones score was 30-40 kills and 30-40 deaths. Thats NOT balanced.. that everyone getting backraped all the time
Conclusion: We now know why nobody ever had heard of Sledgehammer games. What's left of IW are just some people who weren't allowed to join Respawn Entertainment (the new company of the original MoH:AA makers).
Conclusion at 'Dedicated' servers:
How the fuck do they work? I want a normal server and choose the settings ONE time in a cfg file. Not more and not less
Conclusion at 'Listening to the community':
They didn't. Only people who think they are pro care about fov in the first few weeks of a game, so don't think I'm gonna whine about that.. just like 90 fps, thats mostly some forgotten thing they fix later. They only thing they did is looking at some reviews and deciding to leave the nuke out of the game.
Conclusion of all the conclusions:
DONT BUY THE GAME. BUY BF3 instead if you were doubting about it.
MW3 has absolutely NO potential to become a good competetive game.
SORRY BAD ENGLISH
edited 2011-11-09 22:32:02
People expect that there will be a competetive gameplay but i think cod wont make any more.
they are crap
Lets be serious they only thing good about new cod games was a few weeks of good pub action but even this game pub is fucking direbolical (rewarding people for being shit at the game) and this juggernaught thing, lmfao seriously is one of the most unblanced games i have played.
Aint played SP yet tho! im guessing it will be worth a bash!
edited 2011-11-09 14:07:01
This game is SHIT compared to MW2
fixed
IMO the graphics are better than mw2, and I enjoy the maps fully! Ofcourse some are less good than others, but they have huge potential.
You're just another hater, so why bother making a thread about it?
Seems like you cod4 nerds, are scared of new games.
And I didn't understand something about your part on "Listening the community". I may be wrong but did you think the FOV and framerate aren't important? Back when I started to play FPS on PC these two options were fucking basics, it doesn't kill any dev to fucking add them. Pure laziness or just doesn't give a shit about gamers/customers. If a game didn't have it directly it mostly meant that they worked enough on a proper FOV.
With 90 framerate and 65 fov a game CAN be good. I also miss these things, but that's not the first thing you should look at ;-)
and check your sources..
MoH:AA creators splitted => Infinity Ward
MW2 Creators (IW!) splitted => Respawn
edited 2011-11-09 14:46:42
People expect that there will be a competetive gameplay but i think cod wont make any more.
+1
- Way too crowded with 100 objects and details -> IDC
- Bad spawns -> Say what? if you play in bf3, if you respawn your already death by a Spawncamper -.-'
- Too many little ally's and buildings you can go into -> this is just nice
- To many objects you bump up to or looking like you can jump over them while you simply can't --> idk
Conclusion: Made by someone who thinks that cod is about running, killing and running ->you have a point but you are exaggerate.
Graphics :
- Better then black ops, worse then MW2 and even worse then cod2 (dx9 high sett) -> worse than cod2 he?
- Things like multiGPU (more then one videocard) are hidden showing simply that the developers are lazy
- They did less specular maps on objects so that why its better then black ops although alot of textures are shit because they want you to use Dept of Field so you can't see close details and give you a headache instead
- Alot of 'stolen' objects from MW1 and MW2 -> COD2 and COD4 has the same sounds so?
Conclusion: This was a lego game, just copying and pasting all the things from the previous cods -> Yes thats true, but everybody is saying we want a new cod4, only with better graphics and some shit THIS IS THAT GAME
Gameplay:
- Moment from hipfire -> (to) aiming down the sight is SLOW. It's at least 1,5 second and you even need a perk to unlock it.
- Aiming down the sight has almost the same sensitivity as normal what makes aiming less precise.
- You can throw nades just as far as you can throw a flash. WHYYY??? -> +1
- WHY do all the maps have so many ally's and walls and rooms and cars and boxes and buildingparts etc etc. You can't reload somewhere safely because you can't see people comming. -> if you reload in the middle of the street ye, find cover behind a car maybe?
- UAV = the same as Xradar. It's fun in pub but easy.. so why make it easier with advanced UAV??? -> Who cares its public
- The maps are smaller then BF maps though getting lost in MW3 is easier then in a maze. -> bf series has always bigger maps :p
- I had a game where everyones score was 30-40 kills and 30-40 deaths. Thats NOT balanced.. that everyone getting backraped all the time -> Waw 1 time
Conclusion at 'Dedicated' servers:
How the fuck do they work? I want a normal server and choose the settings ONE time in a cfg file. Not more and not less
Conclusion at 'Listening to the community':
they have listening to the community, only not to the professional players.
Conclusion of all the conclusions:
the conclusion is: this is a good game but not anting more. the singleplayer is really the best of all the cods.
Nice details en graphics!
BUY THIS GAME, if you want play cod4 public in a new dress!
SORRY FOR BAD ENGLISH
edited 2011-11-09 14:57:14
- I'm not a BF3 fan, I just bought both and BF3 obv won.
- Too many ally's and object is fucked up because thats what makes a map shit. Think of it; why don't people play broadcast? Why don't people play mp_hideout? RIGHT.
- i've got a point or i don't got a point
- cod2 is one of the best cod's ever made. you don't need running to have a fast good game (youtube; cod2 fragmovie)
- I'm not everyone and the whole game is more like a mod for MW2 then a game by itself. THIS ISNT the new cod4 you idiot
- Nice cover if people can come from everywhere bro. I don't reload in the middle of the street
- I care because MW2 wasn't as shit as this game in public
- I didn't make my point there sorry. In BF you don't get lost and in cod you DO. Mapsize doesn't matter
They havent listened to the community believe me. There are enough professional players that couldve try the new cod and say its shit (on a PC)
The singleplayer of black ops was a movie and the singleplayer of this cod is just like the other MW's. I play on veteran and there you can see how bugged the AI is. Bots not killing eachother and if you prone you win.
The game is overdetailed in some parts and amature as shit
one ofthe best cod ever made.Fixed ;)
Even though I enjoy cod4 more. Not having a team to play with for cod2 is kind of a downside..
edited 2011-11-09 15:23:37
And what are they doing this year, got no idea. Saw MP gameplay on youtube, and every single map was dire. The fuck are they thinking.
I'm about to install torrented SP. We'll see about graphics this year.
And to be honest, I'm still waiting for Cod3. None of modern warfare games was a worthy title of cod.
Which looked exactly the same as mw2.
Black ops had good gameplay though, well made for pc.
they are crap
People expect that there will be a competetive gameplay but i think cod wont make any more.
yes cod is running killing
bf: = teamplay long maps
fuck yea
I don't, because I don't justify paying £40 for a game to play it for 5-7 days and get bored, that's a loss of money and time in my opinion.
u think a patch can save this game ediot?
clue up random quake live tryfacing noob.
CoD4 gets a very small mention near the end.
On the other hand if people want to move to MW3 Then let them at there own will and find a new forum where everybody who enjoys mw3 and want it to go competitive can discuss shit.
Thats my view.